<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Celebrity Hot Tub</title>
	<atom:link href="http://celebrityhottub.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://celebrityhottub.com</link>
	<description>Dance (verb): too much booty in the pants.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 14:46:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When Money Isn&#8217;t Power by cueball</title>
		<link>http://celebrityhottub.com/2013/05/28/when-money-isnt-power/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cueball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 14:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrityhottub.com/?p=481#comment-53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://cueballandeightball.wordpress.com/2013/05/28/when-money-isnt-power/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cueballandeightball&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://cueballandeightball.wordpress.com/2013/05/28/when-money-isnt-power/" rel="nofollow">cueballandeightball</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Devil You Know by Merle</title>
		<link>http://celebrityhottub.com/2013/04/30/the-devil-you-know/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Merle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrityhottub.com/?p=476#comment-51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BTW - Did anyone commenting on this actually read the article?  &quot;Difficult – probably not, but you’d have to ask him.&quot;  Um, he talks about it in SI.  He&#039;s had trouble sleeping for years and didn&#039;t feel comfortable coming out to his twin bother!  I think that qualifies as difficult.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW &#8211; Did anyone commenting on this actually read the article?  &#8220;Difficult – probably not, but you’d have to ask him.&#8221;  Um, he talks about it in SI.  He&#8217;s had trouble sleeping for years and didn&#8217;t feel comfortable coming out to his twin bother!  I think that qualifies as difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Devil You Know by _ (@JerseyBoyNLA)</title>
		<link>http://celebrityhottub.com/2013/04/30/the-devil-you-know/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[_ (@JerseyBoyNLA)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrityhottub.com/?p=476#comment-50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Woah, everybody calm down. Is Brando the first 50 year old white guy?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woah, everybody calm down. Is Brando the first 50 year old white guy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Devil You Know by Merle</title>
		<link>http://celebrityhottub.com/2013/04/30/the-devil-you-know/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Merle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrityhottub.com/?p=476#comment-49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark - If it isn&#039;t &quot;heroic&quot; then why have no other active gay athletes come out? I find it interesting that this is the time when people decide to draw a line in the sand regarding who is considered a hero.  Somehow the semantics are less important when, say, people describe Michael Jordan as &quot;heroic&quot; for playing basketball with the flu.

It was brave of Collins to do this.  He is a hero both in the sense of showing courage and strong character and in the sense that he now provides a role model to both the young gay athlete trying to fit into a sports culture that is still homophobic and cruel at many levels and to other professional athletes who want to come out of the closet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8211; If it isn&#8217;t &#8220;heroic&#8221; then why have no other active gay athletes come out? I find it interesting that this is the time when people decide to draw a line in the sand regarding who is considered a hero.  Somehow the semantics are less important when, say, people describe Michael Jordan as &#8220;heroic&#8221; for playing basketball with the flu.</p>
<p>It was brave of Collins to do this.  He is a hero both in the sense of showing courage and strong character and in the sense that he now provides a role model to both the young gay athlete trying to fit into a sports culture that is still homophobic and cruel at many levels and to other professional athletes who want to come out of the closet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Devil You Know by Mark Bacon</title>
		<link>http://celebrityhottub.com/2013/04/30/the-devil-you-know/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Bacon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrityhottub.com/?p=476#comment-48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Collins risks very little and stands to gain quite a bit (fame and income).  While hatred remains towards LGBT, it is increasingly the minority view.     In balance, he&#039;ll get more support than criticism.  Some slurs and a few unpleasant confrontations, but more support and admiration  The people this upsets are not worth being concerned about.

I don&#039;t believe this is an extraordinarily brave decision.  A decade or two ago, it would have been.  Now, it is a fairly safe choice to make.  Nike has been openly seeking a gay athlete in a major sport, he&#039;ll gain a great deal of fame, probably write a book, speaking engagements, etc. - a place in history for being the first.

As LZ Granderson has argued - it is work to come out, but it is also work to stay in the closet.  Collins&#039; decision may be as pragmatic as anything else.  The &#039;easy&#039; path for Colllins was closed off a long time ago, but that wasn&#039;t a heroic choice.

This was an inevitability. That doesn&#039;t make Collins announcement irrelevant - he&#039;s still the first within a small percentage of the population to do it - but it&#039;s not as brave or heroic as many well-intentioned people want it to be.  Collins deserves our respect and support and his name deserves to go in the book of famous firsts.

Important - yes.  Heroic - no.  Difficult - probably not, but you&#039;d have to ask him. But you won&#039;t have to because hundreds of reporters will.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Collins risks very little and stands to gain quite a bit (fame and income).  While hatred remains towards LGBT, it is increasingly the minority view.     In balance, he&#8217;ll get more support than criticism.  Some slurs and a few unpleasant confrontations, but more support and admiration  The people this upsets are not worth being concerned about.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe this is an extraordinarily brave decision.  A decade or two ago, it would have been.  Now, it is a fairly safe choice to make.  Nike has been openly seeking a gay athlete in a major sport, he&#8217;ll gain a great deal of fame, probably write a book, speaking engagements, etc. &#8211; a place in history for being the first.</p>
<p>As LZ Granderson has argued &#8211; it is work to come out, but it is also work to stay in the closet.  Collins&#8217; decision may be as pragmatic as anything else.  The &#8216;easy&#8217; path for Colllins was closed off a long time ago, but that wasn&#8217;t a heroic choice.</p>
<p>This was an inevitability. That doesn&#8217;t make Collins announcement irrelevant &#8211; he&#8217;s still the first within a small percentage of the population to do it &#8211; but it&#8217;s not as brave or heroic as many well-intentioned people want it to be.  Collins deserves our respect and support and his name deserves to go in the book of famous firsts.</p>
<p>Important &#8211; yes.  Heroic &#8211; no.  Difficult &#8211; probably not, but you&#8217;d have to ask him. But you won&#8217;t have to because hundreds of reporters will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Devil You Know by Metsy (@metschick)</title>
		<link>http://celebrityhottub.com/2013/04/30/the-devil-you-know/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Metsy (@metschick)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrityhottub.com/?p=476#comment-47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, Brando, in the words of Chris Rock: &quot;You don&#039;t get credit for what you&#039;re supposed to do.&quot; Raise your wholesome family and now that raising tomorrow&#039;s ignoramuses is its own reward.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Brando, in the words of Chris Rock: &#8220;You don&#8217;t get credit for what you&#8217;re supposed to do.&#8221; Raise your wholesome family and now that raising tomorrow&#8217;s ignoramuses is its own reward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Answer The Damn Door. by Mike</title>
		<link>http://celebrityhottub.com/2013/04/17/answer-the-damn-door/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 04:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrityhottub.com/?p=438#comment-46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The constituency of the Senate voted to pass the bill, 54-46, that was supported by 90% of Americans.  The only constituency whose majority demanded the bill fail is the NRA. Perhaps you are a little unclear on how representative democracy works Phoenix, but when a majority of people want something, unless the Bill of Rights says otherwise, they get it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The constituency of the Senate voted to pass the bill, 54-46, that was supported by 90% of Americans.  The only constituency whose majority demanded the bill fail is the NRA. Perhaps you are a little unclear on how representative democracy works Phoenix, but when a majority of people want something, unless the Bill of Rights says otherwise, they get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Answer The Damn Door. by mattdaddysblog</title>
		<link>http://celebrityhottub.com/2013/04/17/answer-the-damn-door/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mattdaddysblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 04:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrityhottub.com/?p=438#comment-45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As long as we are both able to define &quot;constituency&quot; as the minority that lobby and contribute to elections and hold hostage the majority of individuals that actually believe differently. 

Then I agree]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as we are both able to define &#8220;constituency&#8221; as the minority that lobby and contribute to elections and hold hostage the majority of individuals that actually believe differently. </p>
<p>Then I agree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Answer The Damn Door. by Anna Borgman</title>
		<link>http://celebrityhottub.com/2013/04/17/answer-the-damn-door/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anna Borgman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 04:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrityhottub.com/?p=438#comment-44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To reject background checks would suggest that they would restrict gun ownership to enough people that it would become an infringement on second amendment rights. That&#039;s what it would suggest. But what it really shows is that not enough people (senators, the NRA, you, your neighbor, myself, etc.) have put enough time into really understanding what the details of what the bill would actually do. As far as I&#039;m concerned, if you cannot pass a background check to own a gun because of some prior issue, you have waived your right to own such a weapon. You made a choice and now your country is making a choice to keep a weapon out of your hands because you have deemed yourself unworthy. You can&#039;t scream &quot;fire&quot; in a crowded theater and you can&#039;t own a deadly weapon if you have a violent or sketchy history (given that is what these background checks are looking for...)

As far as restricting access to guns themselves (to all Americans), listen, if bombs were something that you could purchase at your neighborhood Walmart, we&#039;d be having a conversation about &quot;bomb control.&quot; But you can&#039;t, so we&#039;re not. Gun control is not about restricting anyone&#039;s first amendment rights. It&#039;s about protecting the constitution itself and the &quot;unalienable rights&quot; of the American way of life, namely &quot;Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.&quot; Emphasis on LIFE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To reject background checks would suggest that they would restrict gun ownership to enough people that it would become an infringement on second amendment rights. That&#8217;s what it would suggest. But what it really shows is that not enough people (senators, the NRA, you, your neighbor, myself, etc.) have put enough time into really understanding what the details of what the bill would actually do. As far as I&#8217;m concerned, if you cannot pass a background check to own a gun because of some prior issue, you have waived your right to own such a weapon. You made a choice and now your country is making a choice to keep a weapon out of your hands because you have deemed yourself unworthy. You can&#8217;t scream &#8220;fire&#8221; in a crowded theater and you can&#8217;t own a deadly weapon if you have a violent or sketchy history (given that is what these background checks are looking for&#8230;)</p>
<p>As far as restricting access to guns themselves (to all Americans), listen, if bombs were something that you could purchase at your neighborhood Walmart, we&#8217;d be having a conversation about &#8220;bomb control.&#8221; But you can&#8217;t, so we&#8217;re not. Gun control is not about restricting anyone&#8217;s first amendment rights. It&#8217;s about protecting the constitution itself and the &#8220;unalienable rights&#8221; of the American way of life, namely &#8220;Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.&#8221; Emphasis on LIFE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Answer The Damn Door. by PhoenixTwitter</title>
		<link>http://celebrityhottub.com/2013/04/17/answer-the-damn-door/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PhoenixTwitter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 04:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://celebrityhottub.com/?p=438#comment-43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And so the question in voting on Manchin-Toomey was, do the perceived potential reductions in harm, as you put it, outweigh the rights taken away by this, however you perceive them. And the Senate, beholden to their constituency, said no.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And so the question in voting on Manchin-Toomey was, do the perceived potential reductions in harm, as you put it, outweigh the rights taken away by this, however you perceive them. And the Senate, beholden to their constituency, said no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
